Hardness Testing Methods

Hardness is not a material constant; it only means something together with its method

Brinell, Vickers, Rockwell and Knoop indenters and the impressions they leave

Hardness is defined as a material's resistance to permanent indentation — but that resistance depends on which indenter, which load and how the measurement is made. There is therefore no single absolute definition, and a hardness value is always written together with its method: 220 HV10, 45 HRC, 180 HBW 2.5/187.5. Even so it remains the most widely used test in industry: fast, cheap, almost non-destructive, and the most practical check on heat treatment, welding and surface engineering.

What this note covers

Hardness Is Not a Material Constant

Hardness is the resistance of a surface to permanent indentation under a defined indenter, load and dwell time. Change any of those three and the number changes. That is why a hardness value without its method is not a measurement: 350 HV10 is a statement; “350 hardness” is not.

How to write it: 350 HV10 means Vickers, 10 kgf, standard dwell. 60 HRC means Rockwell C scale. 210 HBW 10/3000 means Brinell with a 10 mm tungsten carbide ball at 3000 kgf. A specification that omits the scale cannot be verified or disputed.

The Four Classical Methods

Brinell (EN ISO 6506 / ASTM E10) presses a tungsten carbide ball and measures the diameter of the impression. The large indentation averages over a coarse structure, which makes it the natural method for castings, forgings and unmachined material — and unsuitable for thin parts, hardened surfaces or small sections.

Vickers (EN ISO 6507 / ASTM E92, E384) uses a 136° diamond pyramid. One continuous scale covers everything from soft metals to carbides, and the geometry is self-similar, so results at different loads are comparable. With low loads (HV0.1–HV1) it becomes microhardness: the method for case depth traverses, individual phases and thin layers.

Rockwell (EN ISO 6508 / ASTM E18) measures the depth difference between a preload and a main load, reading directly from the instrument — fast, which is why it dominates production control. HRC (diamond cone, 150 kgf) is valid from roughly 20 to 70 HRC; HRB (1.588 mm ball, 100 kgf) covers softer materials.

Two classic Rockwell errors: reading HRC below 20, where the scale is simply not valid, and testing a thin or case-hardened part whose indentation reaches the softer substrate — the “anvil effect”. Both produce confident, meaningless numbers.

Knoop (ISO 4545 / ASTM E384) uses an elongated diamond that produces a shallow, long impression — the choice for very thin layers, brittle materials and measurements close to an edge.

Portable Methods

Large or installed parts cannot be brought to a bench tester. Leeb (rebound) instruments measure the velocity ratio of an impacting body and need sufficient mass and a smooth surface — thin or light parts must be coupled to a heavy support. UCI devices measure the frequency shift of a vibrating rod loaded with a Vickers diamond; they are sensitive to surface roughness and to the material’s elastic modulus, so they require calibration on the actual material. Both convert internally to a conventional scale, which means they inherit all the limitations of conversion.

Field rule: a portable reading is a screening value. Where acceptance or rejection depends on it, confirm on a prepared surface with a bench instrument, or agree the portable method and its uncertainty in writing beforehand.

Conversion Tables and Their Danger

Conversion between scales (ISO 18265 / ASTM E140) is empirical and material dependent. A table derived for unalloyed steel does not hold for austenitic stainless steel, cast iron, nickel alloys, aluminium or cold-worked material. Converted values accumulate error in the direction nobody checks: a part can be rejected for failing a converted limit it would have passed when measured in the specified scale.

The practical rule is simple: specify the method the part will be measured in, and if a conversion must be used, state which standard and which material group it comes from.

Hardness and Tensile Strength

For unalloyed and low-alloy steels the familiar approximation Rm ≈ 3.3 × HB (MPa) is useful for an estimate, nothing more. It fails for cold-worked, austenitic, cast and non-ferrous materials, and it says nothing about yield strength, ductility or toughness — the properties that usually decide whether a part is fit for service.

Sources of Error and the Geometry Rules

SourceEffect and remedy
Surface conditionScale, decarburisation, grinding burn or roughness give false readings — prepare the surface and remove the affected layer
ThicknessThe specimen must be at least 8–10 times the indentation depth; otherwise the anvil shows through
SpacingIndentations must be at least 3–4 diameters apart and from the edge, or the work-hardened field of the previous one is measured
CurvatureReadings on curved surfaces require the correction factors given in the standard
Support and alignmentA part that moves or sits at an angle under load reads low; fixturing is part of the method
CalibrationDaily verification on reference blocks of the relevant range (ISO 6506-3 / 6507-3 / 6508-3)

Hardness Profiles and Case Depth

For surface-hardened parts a single reading is meaningless; a microhardness traverse on a prepared perpendicular section is required. The limit is defined by convention: case hardening depth (CHD) to 550 HV1 for carburised parts (EN ISO 2639 / ISO 18203), nitriding hardness depth (NHD) at core hardness plus 50 HV, and surface hardening depth (SHD) for induction and flame hardening at 80% of the minimum surface hardness. Quoting a case depth without naming the criterion invites a dispute that no later measurement can settle.

The technical note below (A4 PDF, in Turkish) develops these subjects in depth with original diagrams prepared for this series.

Technical Note

Hardness Testing Methods — SAE Technical Publications No.13 (PDF · 0.2 MB, in Turkish)